john hawks weblog

paleoanthropology, genetics and evolution

Anthropology 105

  • Anthropology 105, lecture 15: Hips

    Mon, 2012-04-09 13:09 -- John Hawks
    Synopsis: 
    The human pelvis provides a unique solution to the dual constraints of bipedality and birth.

    This lecture reviews the distinctive shape of the human pelvis and its role in bipedal locomotion. In living people, the pelvis is the most informative skeletal indicator of whether bones represent male or female individuals. The reasons for this stem from the dual constraints operating on our pelvis -- the need to maintain effective bipedal stance and locomotion, and the need to birth infants through the birth canal.

    The lecture discusses the differences between humans and australopithecine pelvic anatomy, using Lucy as the prime example. It includes some discussion of the pelvis of Ardipithecus as well as the pelvis of Homo erectus and Neandertals.

    Study questions: 
    • Why do apes have a pelvic form that tends to "capture" their lower lumbar vertebrae, stiffening their lower backs?
    • Has the human pelvic inlet reached its maximum possible size, or could we evolve to give birth to larger infants?
  • Anthropology 105, lecture 14: Brains

    Mon, 2012-04-09 13:00 -- John Hawks
    Synopsis: 
    Our large brains have many energetic and life history consequences

    This lecture covers the evolution of human brain size with its energetic and developmental consequences. I focus on the different pattern of early childhood development in humans relative to other primates and our extended childhood which is characterized by relatively slow growth in size but continued learning and brain maturation. The differences in the pattern of brain growth in Neandertals and recent people come into the end of the lecture.

  • Anthropology 105, lecture 11: Enamel

    Wed, 2012-03-28 11:42 -- John Hawks
    Synopsis: 
    The teeth preserve a record of ancient diets and lifestyles

    I've gotten a bit behind in posting lectures -- a few technical problems arose in the fifth week of class, and took a week to sort through. Now I've got lectures for the sixth week and forward, and I'll be posting them this week.

    This lecture looks at the enamel of teeth as a source of information about life history of ancient hominins and humans. The essential data are the ratios of different stable isotopes of the elements carbon, nitrogen and oxygen, and the proportion of strontium. The lecture presents some of the background to understand the relation of these stable isotopes to diet and the landscape. They provide evidence about the level on the food chain that an individual occupies, the proportion of grass-derived foods to foods from other plants, and the geographic region where an individual formed his or her teeth.

    I cover some examples, including the diet of early hominins, the Neandertals, and some archaeological examples from prehistoric and medieval Britain.

    Study terms: 
  • Genotyping the intro class

    Fri, 2012-02-24 00:26 -- John Hawks

    Holly Dunsworth, at the University of Rhode Island, is undertaking a unique project with her undergraduate course this semester, providing 23andMe genotyping for every student. She describes some of her thoughts on the "cans of worms" that this may create for her: "First we were snapped, now we're SNP'd".

    Part of what students have to do this semester is form a 'plan of action.' That's what I've called their assignment where they predict what their SNPs will hold and where they explain what they will do if they find out they're at high risk for a disease or even, yes, that they might not be related to their father. (This discovery doesn't require paternal DNA. Since half of your genome is from your father, and since a few traits are pretty simple, the rare participant with the rare SNP can deduce that they did not get their DNA from their father who doesn't show the trait in question.)

    I've been discussing this issue a lot with people lately. In a few years, most of my students will have whole-genome genotyping or sequencing done for routine medical purposes, because that's how cheap it will be. Interpretation of the results will not (necessarily) be cheap, and it may not be appreciably better than it is now.

    Some readers will say, "Well, if the interpretation isn't a lot better than now, nobody will want the results anyway, so it won't happen."

    I disagree. Take Mendelian disorders. Today, every child in Wisconsin is tested for a few dozen genetic disorders at birth. It is already possible to screen parents for every Mendelian disorder with a frequency of more than one in a thousand. In a short time, that genotyping will be cheaper than the current postnatal testing. Prenatal care already includes a score of tests, and fetal cell genotyping may eventually replace postnatal testing for genetic disorders. Moreover, companies (for example, Counsyl) are already providing genotyping and interpretive services for the couples prenatal testing market. As genotyping becomes cheaper, it will pull in a broader and broader fraction of my students, future college graduates and professionals.

    So I've taken it as my attitude that my biological anthropology courses must educate them for this future. Our curricula can provide the students useful information about health and ancestry, including both the promise and limits of genetic information. The beauty of the new genetic approaches is that they provide better illustrations of most of the classic topics in human biology and variation. You can see some of that at play in my Principles of Biological Anthropology lectures this semester.

    Synopsis: 
    Holly Dunsworth shares some perspective on 23andMe testing for her students
  • Anthropology 105, lecture 6: Blood

    Mon, 2012-02-20 13:04 -- John Hawks
    Synopsis: 
    Blood disorders illustrate the concepts of inheritance in pedigrees and founder effects in colonial populations

    Here's a lecture that presents two fascinating tales of disease and blood in the royal families of Britain. The first involves the madness of King George III, which present-day forensic historians attribute to variegate porphyria. This condition is also the subject of a famous story of founder effect in genetics, because of its current high frequency in the South African Afrikaner population. Then, the lecture turns to Rasputin and the hemophilia of Tsarevitch Alexei, inherited from Queen Victoria. The influence of genetics on history is reinforced by the recurrence of this genetic disorder in the pedigree of the Spanish royal family as well, all stemming from the one woman at the center of the European royal genealogy.

    In the course of the lecture, I cover the concepts of how damage to genes due to random mutations can cause Mendelian disorders, how we can identify the causes of disorders using pedigree information, how forensic investigators can build up a case for medical diagnosis of historical figures, and how gene frequencies can change a lot due to random chance in founder populations.

    Study questions: 
    • How much evidence should we require before accepting a forensic medical diagnosis of a historical figure? Do you find the case of George III convincing?
    • Hemophilia in the royal families of Europe is X-linked, meaning that the causal mutation is carried on the X chromosome. How does this differ from the usual Mendelian genetic disorder?
    • What conditions make genetic changes by founder effects more likely to happen?
  • Mailbag: Watching lectures

    Thu, 2012-02-09 16:21 -- John Hawks

    Re: "Anthropology 105, lecture 3: Legs"

    I just watched
    one of your lectures, 'Legs', which you've put up on your blog - and I
    had to let you know that I enjoyed it immensely.

    Thanks for putting it up and for letting me have a peek into your
    classroom. I hope you will continue to put up videos like this.

    Thank you so much for letting me know!

    I'm still getting the hang of the system, so I expect some of the lectures will be a lot better than this one!

  • Anthropology 105, lecture 4: Vertebrae

    Tue, 2012-02-07 17:57 -- John Hawks
    Synopsis: 
    Vertebrae, segmentation in body plans, and homology

    In this lecture, the key concepts are homology, serial homology, gene regulation, and the geological timeline. I introduce the vertebral column and the number of vertebrae of different types in humans, gorillas, orangutans and macaques. Looking at some data from Adolph Schultz, we examine the variation in vertebra count among humans and some other species of primates. To discuss the concept of variation in segment numbers, I turn to Hox genes and segmentation patterning in early embryos. Homology of the Hox genes between fruit flies, mice and humans mirrors the homology of segmentation, including vertebrae counts. Finally, I get to some Miocene apes and their lumbar vertebral anatomy, focusing on Nacholapithecus, Morotopithecus and Proconsul.

    This one stopped a bit short of where I wanted to go, but it's a neat combination of topics in anatomy and development.

    This is a continuing experiment in sharing the lectures for the course online. For my explainer, you can see Lecture 2: Feet.

    Study questions: 
    • What other parts of the body reflect serial homology?
    • The lecture used wings in birds as an example of homology. What other natural examples can you think of?
    • What is another natural example of convergence or parallelism?
    • Why can we use mice to learn about development in humans?
  • Anthropology 105, lecture 3: Legs

    Tue, 2012-02-07 16:46 -- John Hawks
    Synopsis: 
    Why children resemble their parents, through the concept of heritability

    In this lecture, the main theme is the concept of heritability. I use survey data from my class, both this semester and over several years, to examine stature in the students and their parents. I illustrate the idea of the normal distribution with stature data, and discuss the reasons why continuously measured traits often fit that distribution. Also, I define the idea of "regression to the mean" and discuss its relation to inheritance.

    This is a continuing experiment in sharing the lectures for the course online. For my explainer, you can see Lecture 2: Feet.

    Study questions: 
    • Why do you think human populations are different in their average statures?
    • Can you list some traits that have lower heritability than stature in humans? What would the relationship of parent and offspring values look like for these traits?
    • What would be a trait that has zero heritability?
    • How can animal breeders manage to increase the value of traits like milk production in their animals, if regression to the mean ensures that the highest-producing animals will have offspring with lower mean values for such traits?
  • Anthropology 105, lecture 2: Feet

    Sun, 2012-02-05 13:57 -- John Hawks
    Synopsis: 
    An open courseware lecture for my course at the University of Wisconsin-Madison

    I'm doing an open courseware initiative with my introductory course, Principles of Biological Anthropology. I have set up the course very differently than most introductory courses in evolution. Each lecture is centered around a part of the body, giving a perspective on its evolution in hominins, the genetics underlying its variation in humans, and how we compare to other kinds of primates. This is the first lecture I'm posting to the front page of the weblog, but it is the second lecture in the course. The first lecture, which is mainly devoted to introducing the course requirements and syllabus for enrolled students, is also available online for those who may be interested.

    Putting the lectures online is a true experiment for me. It is already proving to be valuable for the students enrolled here in the course at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. By making the materials open, I hope that many people outside the university may also find them useful. The course schedule and other materials, including the lab assignments and readings, are online at the course webpage. They are a work in progress, as always in my courses, and run a week or two ahead of the dates indicated.

    The topic of this lecture is "Feet". The lecture covers the gross anatomical differences among the feet of different great apes and humans, the evidence for bipedality in Australopithecus afarensis focusing on metatarsal anatomy and the Laetoli footprints, some details about the feet of Australopithecus sediba, which show an interesting mosaic of anatomy, the foot anatomy of Ardipithecus ramidus, and evidence for footwear in Upper Paleolithic humans based on reduction of the lateral toes. The overarching concepts reviewed in the lecture are phylogeny and the idea that different lineages may arrive at different solutions for common evolutionary problems.

    The university's streaming solution uses a Flash player that I have embedded here. This solution does not work on all devices (in particular, tablets and phones) and I apologize if those are your preferred browsing medium. I'm still investigating options to make the lectures more broadly available.

    Study questions: 
    • How would you investigate the differences in the feet of people today to understand the functional consequences of their variation?
    • What would you expect the ancestor of great apes to look like, in terms of its foot anatomy?
    • Why do you hypothesize that gibbon feet and orangutan feet appear so different in their anatomy?
    • Do you expect other early hominin fossils to have similar foot anatomy to A. afarensis?

Pages

Subscribe to Anthropology 105

Neandertals

For years, I've worked on their bones. Now I'm working on their genes. Read more about the science studying these ancient people.

Denisova

From a finger bone of an ancient human came the record of a completely unexpected population. My lab is working on the science of the Denisova genome.

Acceleration

The advent of agriculture caused natural selection to speed up greatly in humans. We're uncovering some of the ways that populations have rapidly changed during the last 10,000 years.

Malapa

Just outside Johannesburg, the Malapa site is producing some of the most exciting finds in human evolution. This site is the headquarters of the Malapa Soft Tissue Project.