john hawks weblog

paleoanthropology, genetics and evolution

teaching

  • Mailbag: Watching lectures

    Thu, 2012-02-09 16:21 -- John Hawks

    Re: "Anthropology 105, lecture 3: Legs"

    I just watched
    one of your lectures, 'Legs', which you've put up on your blog - and I
    had to let you know that I enjoyed it immensely.

    Thanks for putting it up and for letting me have a peek into your
    classroom. I hope you will continue to put up videos like this.

    Thank you so much for letting me know!

    I'm still getting the hang of the system, so I expect some of the lectures will be a lot better than this one!

  • Job marketing yourself

    Thu, 2012-02-09 08:37 -- John Hawks

    Some job interview advice from Karen Kelsky: "The 'Be Yourself' Myth".

    [Y]ou have to create a professional persona. That persona is a full-fledged adult who demonstrates a tightly organized research program, a calm confidence in a research contribution to a field or discipline, a clear and specific trajectory of publications, innovative but concise, non-emotional ideas about teaching at all levels of the curriculum, a non-defensive openness to the exchange of ideas, and most importantly, a steely-eyed grasp of the real (as opposed to fantasy) needs of actual hiring departments, which revolve ultimately, in the current market, around money.

    I have many friends on the job market this year. The advice isn't precisely pertinent for postdocs, but with some small alterations it still works.

  • Anthropology 105, lecture 4: Vertebrae

    Tue, 2012-02-07 17:57 -- John Hawks
    Synopsis: 
    Vertebrae, segmentation in body plans, and homology

    In this lecture, the key concepts are homology, serial homology, gene regulation, and the geological timeline. I introduce the vertebral column and the number of vertebrae of different types in humans, gorillas, orangutans and macaques. Looking at some data from Adolph Schultz, we examine the variation in vertebra count among humans and some other species of primates. To discuss the concept of variation in segment numbers, I turn to Hox genes and segmentation patterning in early embryos. Homology of the Hox genes between fruit flies, mice and humans mirrors the homology of segmentation, including vertebrae counts. Finally, I get to some Miocene apes and their lumbar vertebral anatomy, focusing on Nacholapithecus, Morotopithecus and Proconsul.

    This one stopped a bit short of where I wanted to go, but it's a neat combination of topics in anatomy and development.

    This is a continuing experiment in sharing the lectures for the course online. For my explainer, you can see Lecture 2: Feet.

    Study questions: 
    • What other parts of the body reflect serial homology?
    • The lecture used wings in birds as an example of homology. What other natural examples can you think of?
    • What is another natural example of convergence or parallelism?
    • Why can we use mice to learn about development in humans?
  • Into the belly of the whale

    Mon, 2012-02-06 22:21 -- John Hawks

    Carl Zimmer profiles anatomist Joy Reidenberg, who has scored a coup for public communication of science on the BBC show, Inside Nature's Giants: "From Inside Lions and Leviathans, Anatomist Builds a Following". Joy is well-known in paleoanthropology circles:

    For her Ph.D., she came to Mount Sinai Medical School to work with Jeffrey T. Laitman, an expert on the anatomy of the head and neck.

    Since the 1970s, Dr. Laitman has been looking for anatomical clues to the evolution of human speech. Dr. Reidenberg expanded the scope of his work to look at the vocal anatomy of mammals, from moose to rabbits. In 1983, she began teaching at Mount Sinai, and she has focused much of her research on the most remarkable of all mammal voices: those of whales and dolphins."

    Can't wait until the show gets going here.

  • Anthropology 105, lecture 2: Feet

    Sun, 2012-02-05 13:57 -- John Hawks
    Synopsis: 
    An open courseware lecture for my course at the University of Wisconsin-Madison

    I'm doing an open courseware initiative with my introductory course, Principles of Biological Anthropology. I have set up the course very differently than most introductory courses in evolution. Each lecture is centered around a part of the body, giving a perspective on its evolution in hominins, the genetics underlying its variation in humans, and how we compare to other kinds of primates. This is the first lecture I'm posting to the front page of the weblog, but it is the second lecture in the course. The first lecture, which is mainly devoted to introducing the course requirements and syllabus for enrolled students, is also available online for those who may be interested.

    Putting the lectures online is a true experiment for me. It is already proving to be valuable for the students enrolled here in the course at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. By making the materials open, I hope that many people outside the university may also find them useful. The course schedule and other materials, including the lab assignments and readings, are online at the course webpage. They are a work in progress, as always in my courses, and run a week or two ahead of the dates indicated.

    The topic of this lecture is "Feet". The lecture covers the gross anatomical differences among the feet of different great apes and humans, the evidence for bipedality in Australopithecus afarensis focusing on metatarsal anatomy and the Laetoli footprints, some details about the feet of Australopithecus sediba, which show an interesting mosaic of anatomy, the foot anatomy of Ardipithecus ramidus, and evidence for footwear in Upper Paleolithic humans based on reduction of the lateral toes. The overarching concepts reviewed in the lecture are phylogeny and the idea that different lineages may arrive at different solutions for common evolutionary problems.

    The university's streaming solution uses a Flash player that I have embedded here. This solution does not work on all devices (in particular, tablets and phones) and I apologize if those are your preferred browsing medium. I'm still investigating options to make the lectures more broadly available.

    Study questions: 
    • How would you investigate the differences in the feet of people today to understand the functional consequences of their variation?
    • What would you expect the ancestor of great apes to look like, in terms of its foot anatomy?
    • Why do you hypothesize that gibbon feet and orangutan feet appear so different in their anatomy?
    • Do you expect other early hominin fossils to have similar foot anatomy to A. afarensis?
  • Best practices and tips for Twitter in the higher-ed classroom

    Fri, 2012-01-06 00:40 -- John Hawks

    College students have become used to instant communication. Many professors complain that technology has given their students short attention spans and poor study skills. Others bewail the end of civilization, as they see their students reading Facebook during class instead of taking notes.

    In reality, students are adapting to a new information environment. The cues that guided young academics to new ideas a generation ago were subtle, steeped in unwritten formalities, and exclusionary. Today, the best students are using social networks, feeds, and blogs to forage for the information that matters to them. But others will inevitably take advantage of the social buffet to browse away from your course's content.

    What to do?

    Try taking the reins, to meet your students at the information smorgasbord. Getting your students to interact with each other outside of class is one of the best ways to deepen their educational experience.

    Twitter is a tool that can enable ad hoc conversations and interactions among your students, in ways that you can track and foster. Your students may not all be familiar with Twitter, but its simplicity and availability, much like text messages on a phone, has a broad appeal.

    Curious about how to apply Twitter in your classroom? Or maybe you've tried it in the past but had only partial success. My list of suggestions outlines some of the most common questions and hangups encountered with Twitter among groups of students.

    I use Twitter in large undergraduate lecture courses, where participation is voluntary and happens in conjunction with other modes of communication. I have spoken to many who use it in smaller courses and who require students to use Twitter in certain assignments. These applications all have their distinctive features, but there are many commonalities that emerge in today's diverse student communities. Here are some of them:

    Learn to work in 140 characters.

    The absolute greatest thing about Twitter: It forces concision. If you're a blathering, droning lecturer who won't shut up, Twitter will show you the smackdown.

    Brevity runs a risk. Your course syllabus has bloated to include 3 pages of small print in legalese for a reason. After years of teaching, you've seen students misinterpret every clear statement in every conceivable way. Every tweet is like a grenade waiting to explode with mistaken misinterpretations.

    Solution: Edit, edit, edit. The key to effective tweets is setting them aside for awhile before sending. Make sure every word counts.

    If 140 characters seems like being chained in a box, try to find the freedom in brevity. When you read a great story, you can forward it to your students in a flash with no regrets and little explanation. Salt your tweetstream with items from your feeds in the morning. Let your students take the pulse of how a real expert forages for information. Or set up a list with some of the best tweeps in your field of study, and encourage your students to follow it. Leverage the power of the Twitterverse.

    Make the course hashtag part of the syllabus.

    As cool as you are, your students may not want to follow you. Besides, as cool as you are, most of your tweets have nothing to do with your class! Besides, Twitter isn't about your students following you, it's about enabling them to find information from each other. You need a hashtag for your course. A student who keeps a search on the hashtag will see every tweet, including those by other students. This keeps the conversation open because any student can chime in anytime.

    Picking a hashtag is easy. It should include the course number and something memorable or distinctive. For example, my Principles of Biological Anthropology course at the University of Wisconsin-Madison has the hashtag #uw105. Put it on the syllabus and show students how to use it on the first day. Give them a little handholding.

    Above all, when you've thought of the most awesome gangbusters hashtag, check first to make sure someone else isn't already using it. The last thing you want is to have your students confused because Unlimited Wrestling is using your hashtag for their 105-lb weight class.

    Students always have the option to reply to you or other students without the hashtag, taking the conversation to a more private sphere.

    Bring the feed into the classroom.

    The main problem with Twitter as part of a course: Most students may already have accounts, but don't use them. My first semester, I had only two dozen active tweeps out of a class of 240.

    Fortunately, there are many ways to leverage a small amount of initial engagement into a bigger interactive presence. Make an informal assignment to devise a 140-character answer to a question, and promote the best answers in class. When your students tweet a useful link, retweet it to your followers. Use the class hashtag to send informal study questions on the current readings, or preview the next day's discussion.

    One way to encourage greater uptake is to use Storify. Students can compile their tweets into a record of notes for the class session, or can use Twitter to put together a study guide for an exam. Because Storify stories are accessible from the web without Twitter, they also provide a way to show non-tweeps the value of Twitter in your classroom.

    Maybe the gutsiest use of Twitter is a live twitterfall next to your lecture slides. Giving your class a backchannel gives the students a voice even when they are listening to your lecture. My students have made great use of the backchannel during certain lectures, asking questions about the content that I can answer right during class. If you have a teaching assistant, you can task him to handle Twitter during lectures and alert you to questions; or you can watch the tweetstream yourself. But there's a risk: After all, when you give students a voice, some of them will use it to complain. Be ready to respond to questions, confusions, and complaints with good humor.

    Reward the students who are participating with attention. A daily pick of the top tweet, or a weekly top five, may be a real morale booster for certain students. Retweets are the currency of the Twitterverse, so use them liberally. Put your students into contact with other professional tweeps by mentioning them together in the same tweet.

    Be professional.

    If you spend a lot of time answering student e-mails, moving some of those questions Twitter can be a huge relief. An answer in 140 characters approaches the simplicity of handling questions in person at the end of class. But even though a tweet can be brief (or maybe especially because of brevity) you need to be conscious of your professional role in your class.

    All the usual advice about electronic communication applies to Twitter, too. Don't try too hard to be funny: Humor can easily go wrong in a diverse classroom, and in an electronic setting is often misinterpreted. Especially when the 140-character limit makes you omit words from the punchline.

    Twitter can help to level barriers in your classroom, but don't be too casual. You may be able to run your class effectively without formalities, but you are part of a college or department where not every instructor has your abilities. Don't unwittingly undermine your friends and colleagues.

    Don't assume your students are hanging on your every tweet, but be aware that some will cling to the barest scrap. A breezy tweet may mean little to you after you've written a dozen of them, but be conscious that a student may read those 140 characters just as they've spent most of the night studying for your next exam. Students may appreciate your quick and open communication style, but they are conscious of your power over their grades.

    Students in the U.S. are protected by FERPA, which limits the ways that coursework can be released to the public. That doesn't mean you can't assign graded exercises on Twitter, but you should be ready to justify your pedagogical goals: Is Twitter giving your students an additional way to communicate and synthesize content in the course, or do you expect that public communication is a skill they must master to be effective in your field? Anticipating possible outcomes for students is part of designing effective courses, and in this respect Twitter is adding a new twist to an old theme.

    Be prepared for abuse.

    Twitter is a public channel. Anyone who has tweeted much will have encountered spammers. Fortunately, bots and spammers usually don't tweet with hashtags, so they're unlikely to show up for students keeping a search on your course hashtag. But if you retweet your students' tweets, you should be prepared for the possibility that spammers find their usernames more than they would otherwise have done.

    Twitter makes it easy to report spam and block users. Making quick use of these facilities is often the most effective way to keep your students' timelines relatively uncluttered with spam. When you introduce Twitter to your course, you should always mention and highlight the ways that the service enables blocking other users.

    Because it's a public channel, one of your students may believe anonymity will protect him if he decides to be abusive. It's very easy to sign up for an anonymous Twitter account and a student can throw bombs into other students' timelines by including the course hashtag. An instructor needs to be concerned about the potential for cyberstalking or harassment, also.

    Fortunately, like other uses of technology in the classroom, your students' interactions on Twitter probably fall under your institution's electronic use guidelines. That means you have help from your IT department and college administration if you have a student creating a disruption. Don't think that an abusive student is solely a problem for your class: Electronic abuse and harassment are antithetical to a college's mission to teach students.

    A simple warning may be enough to let students know that anonymity will not protect bad behavior. Make it clear that electronic abuse is as serious or more serious than plagiarism. If you face a case of abuse that you suspect is caused by a student, inside or outside your classroom, make it clear to the entire class that the case will be dealt with by your institution's academic affairs personnel.

    A Twitter glossary:

    Tweet: The basic message, much like a text message on a phone. It's limited to 140 characters in length.

    Timeline: A series of tweets from people and lists that a user follows.

    Follow: By following another user or list, their tweets show up in your timeline.

    Tweeps: 6-character slang for followers and Twitter friends.

    List: A timeline can quickly become unmanageable if you're following hundreds of users. Including a set of related users in a list allows you to focus on content.

    Link shortener: Services like bit.ly or goo.gl take a long URL and give an equivalent that is 20 characters or less, making it possible to comment on links in a single tweet. Each of these services is essentially a huge database linking long URLs to short, customized ones.

    TweetDeck: Many users rely only on twitter.com or dedicated mobile apps for Twitter. Others use one of several software applications that manage Twitter content. Apps like TweetDeck automate certain tasks, like link shortening, and enable fast switching between concurrent searches.

    Hashtag: Any text string preceded by the hash (#) sign. Tagging a tweet with a hashtag helps to group tweets by subject. Searching by hashtag enables people to follow tweets from a course or meeting even if they don't know which users may be there.

    @: @ is a special character that let's Twitter know a username is coming (e.g., @johnhawks).

    Mention: A tweet that includes a user's @username. This shows up in the user's @mentions timeline.

    Reply: Clicking "reply" will compose a tweet that begins with a @username. This shows up in the user's @mentions timeline, but will not show up in your follower's timelines unless they also follow the @user you reference. Appending anything to the beginning of the tweet (like a '.') will make it appear in your followers' timelines, too.

    D: Twitter's private message option. If a user follows you, you can send them a direct message by D username. This will not show up in timelines of any of your followers.

    RT: The retweet. A basic way of relaying other people's tweets to your followers.

    MT: The "modified tweet". You can add a comment and edit other people's tweets to stay under 140 characters, and it's good form to include an "MT" to show that you've changed the original.

    Storify: A service (from Storify.com) that enables you to categorize a series of tweets and compile them with additional content into a narrative of an event.

    Other resources

    People are integrating Twitter into their classes all over the world, in many different academic settings, and they are sharing their ideas. Here are a few:

    "Professor Encourages Students to Pass Notes During Class — via Twitter": Jeffrey Young reported in the Chronicle of Higher Education about Cole Camplese, one of the first to use a live twitterwall alongside his lecture slides.

    "A Professor's Tips for Using Twitter in the Classroom": An even earlier article from Young, about David Perry's use of Twitter in an electronic communications class.

    "Twitter in the Classroom (this replaces those)": David Silver notes that Twitter replaces listserv, e-mail announcements, and serves as a way for students to share online assignments in other formats.

    "Twitter for Academia": Tips from AcademHack that go beyond the classroom and includes some ways that Twitter can actually promote good writing habits.

    "5 Unique Uses of Twitter in the Classroom": US News gave some interesting advice in their last higher education edition, focusing on ways that Twitter may benefit students beyond the classroom, and some very creative exercises.

    Synopsis: 
    Thinking about integrating Twitter in your class communication strategy? Here are some pointers.
  • In the lab of Shakhashiri

    Thu, 2012-01-05 21:09 -- John Hawks

    Nature this week profiles [1] my University of Wisconsin-Madison colleague Bassam Shakhashiri, now president of the American Chemical Society. Around here he is most famous for his activism in science education and outreach, which goes back many years. The profile discusses how Shakhashiri started in education:

    Science education should aim to share the beauty, challenges and rewards of open enquiry and help people to avoid sham, quackery and unproven conjecture. Interacting with students deepens my own understanding of science and of the process of learning science. When I joined the University of Wisconsin–Madison as a faculty member in 1970, my mission was to improve undergraduate chemistry education for all students, not just for science majors. In 1984, I became the assistant director for science and engineering education at the US National Science Foundation, after those programmes were almost phased out early in the administration of President Ronald Reagan. I rebuilt the programmes and created new ones. When I returned to the University of Wisconsin–Madison in 1990, I worked on science-literacy initiatives that focused on classroom instruction and the public appreciation of science.

    He gives an amazing show, full of chemical and physical tricks. It is so interesting how masters of science education and outreach leverage the advantages of their fields to find different ways to hit broader audiences. A chemist like Shakhashiri can do tricks like a magician on a stage; an astronomer like Neil deGrasse Tyson (recently profiled by Carl Zimmer) can take people on a virtual voyage through the universe. A physicist like Brian Greene can twist space or look inward to the smallest particles; a neurologist like Oliver Sacks can bring you on rounds to hear the stories of the strangest patients.


    References

    1. Hoffman J. 2012. Q&A: The science showman. Nature 481:28 - 28.
  • Mailbag: The value of humanities research

    Wed, 2011-12-21 00:21 -- John Hawks

    Re: "Is humanistic research a waste of time?"

    Dear John,

    Criticisms of humanities research like Bauerlein's may have merit in some cases, but number of citations of recent work is not the right measure of relevance. Here are several interrelated points.

    First, what matters is the network of influences. Within the humanities, as in the sciences, there are scholarly communities, more tightly connected within communities, and more loosely connected between communities. A scholarly work may influence distant nodes of the network in ways that don't lead to citation. To take the extreme case, suppose that only one person, X, reads work A by another author, but X's A-influenced writing is widely read by others. Work A might never merit a citation from anyone but X, even if what is so interesting about X's work depends in essential ways on what X learned from A. Sometimes the network goes through a single individual: X cites A in an early work, but X's subsequent, more influential work, only cites X's own earlier piece in which X's ideas were being developed partly in response to A. (Suppose that only Husserl read Frege, to whom he responded in an early work. How many Continental philosophers these days have read Frege? Some might not even have read Husserl, I suppose, despite his indirect influence on their thought.)

    Second, a work can influence thinking in respects which are more subtle than those which merit citation. Reading someone else's work may suggest patterns of thought, styles of research, etc. Or a work might convince you that certain paths are not worth following, leading to research of a different kind. This influence won't necessarily warrant citation. (I've gradually become aware that pervasive aspects of my research were loosely inspired by ideas in works I read years ago. I want to give credit where credit is due, but according to academic standards the connection between my current research and these works is simply not direct enough to warrant citation in some cases, however. I'd describe these connections in print only if I were writing an intellectual autobiography or writing for a Festschrift on the author of the influential works.)

    Third, some works might have significant influence decades after their publication. (I recently became aware of a 19th Century engineering professor who has written on ideas related to mine.)

    You can quote me by name if you want.

    Best wishes,
    Marshall

    Thanks for writing!

    I don't disagree with your point that citations are not a perfect measure of relevance. Possibly we should ignore citations entirely.

    And yet…Frege has a whole lot of citations every year. Probably anyone we can name off the top of our heads counts among the most widely cited of scholars.

    I have sympathy for your argument that every single interaction has the potential to unexpectedly influence someone down the line. The principle is that any action may be the tipping point. But it seems like a horrible marginal use of time. A semester with the chance to touch and influence 20 students is on balance a better chance of attaining that tipping point than a never-read research article.

    I would argue that we should value research, and we can do this by doing research that people find relevant. Easier said than done, though!

Pages

Subscribe to teaching

Neandertals

For years, I've worked on their bones. Now I'm working on their genes. Read more about the science studying these ancient people.

Denisova

From a finger bone of an ancient human came the record of a completely unexpected population. My lab is working on the science of the Denisova genome.

Acceleration

The advent of agriculture caused natural selection to speed up greatly in humans. We're uncovering some of the ways that populations have rapidly changed during the last 10,000 years.

Malapa

Just outside Johannesburg, the Malapa site is producing some of the most exciting finds in human evolution. This site is the headquarters of the Malapa Soft Tissue Project.