john hawks weblog

paleoanthropology, genetics and evolution

Younger Dryas

  • "Obviously [spores] are not nanodiamonds"

    Sun, 2010-06-27 10:28 -- John Hawks

    John Roach reports on the latest episode in the Younger Dryas impact scenario: "Fungi, Feces Show Comet Didn't Kill Ice Age Mammals?" A key piece of evidence supporting the idea of an impact is the presence of carbon microspherules in sediments of the right era. But people have increasingly noticed those spherules turn up all over the place:

    The new research, however, detected carbon spherules in soil layers from before, during, and after the Younger Dryas, making it hard to argue that the particles are products of a sudden impact.

    What's more, Scott's team found that most of the spherules are similar to tightly packed balls of fungus found in modern soils that have been exposed to low to moderate heat during wildfires. Plant and soil fungi are known to create these balls of material to help them survive extreme conditions.

    Other elongated forms of the spherules match modern fecal pellets from insects.

    "All these particles are of natural biological origin and are not related to either intense wildfires or cosmic impacts," Scott said in an email.

    That's one of the neat side effects of a debate like this -- it really compels a lot of investigation into poorly known phenomena that are pretty interesting. The quote from the title of my post comes near the end of the article, where somebody is claiming that fungus may create "microscopic patterns" that trick people into thinking they are nanodiamonds. On the nano-scale, wacky stuff is happening all around us -- did you know that ordinary water is full of nano-ice crystals all the time?

    UPDATE (2010-06-27): A reader:

    The earth passing thru a large cloud of cosmic dust could also explain the broad distribution of nanodiamonds.

    Not a bad idea.

  • Flying rock skepticism

    Mon, 2009-12-14 10:36 -- John Hawks

    Anthropology.net reports on new work by François Paquay and colleagues that casts more doubt on the Younger Dryas impact event ("The Clovis comet that wasn't? Mystery deepens"). I wrote about another paper by Todd Surovell and colleagues earlier this fall ("The Younger Dryas impact fizzle?").

    Why am I interested? There were several events during the Pleistocene that may have affected global climate -- the Toba volcano stands out, but there are others also. It is really difficult to test whether these events actually affected human populations, however -- the quality of evidence we have is very poor. But the Younger Dryas is recent enough that we have a lot more power to test the hypothesis that humans were affected by an impact.

    Problem is, the geologists seem to disagree about whether an impact even happened!

    I try to keep this in mind, when we see other reports (from a single event, or even a single core of lake sediments) that massive climate catastrophes must have decimated ancient human populations.

Subscribe to Younger Dryas

Neandertals

For years, I've worked on their bones. Now I'm working on their genes. Read more about the science studying these ancient people.

Denisova

From a finger bone of an ancient human came the record of a completely unexpected population. My lab is working on the science of the Denisova genome.

Acceleration

The advent of agriculture caused natural selection to speed up greatly in humans. We're uncovering some of the ways that populations have rapidly changed during the last 10,000 years.

Malapa

Just outside Johannesburg, the Malapa site is producing some of the most exciting finds in human evolution. This site is the headquarters of the Malapa Soft Tissue Project.